Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 16 February 2022 22:01 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936373A16F1; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.813
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.813 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.714, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MS6Mf5U1ZzjD; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226923A165E; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id k60-20020a17090a4cc200b001b932781f3eso5025727pjh.0; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gNeukKn7ZNP5yvaCvz0Bpd9Y2mjWFYeDfoQ5HmTvU0g=; b=K0uCK7DIEdgOcmQFKVcz3LTWno2N3EZXUap/FIVNLzvxFn5c341/AqhzvRLuKAu14E 8Y3qel2OfG5Xunkw+nhatc9MH0H6Z00rCDA2zkIBFaJ6UQcljo8mOWiEda3Gb+AK2n4H 31NAy/CyqWzQ70zWB9/Ai59KILyyl215Xdz3uN7m4pkHN4tNR0GoXyppL2n/lzALCY5W p6MMzgSAO9r0OSmI9vfoGAR/au5vbH+OQxW2HGkAjrusxHuN3dsLvT7tGAdh2OE44/YE BVwKvJ2cByIY1RzRV2Ni3z8pWXrmMsCGNLnTHtEjtbosm8JszaVAdRQwIpLYHSOGWulv AQhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gNeukKn7ZNP5yvaCvz0Bpd9Y2mjWFYeDfoQ5HmTvU0g=; b=v8a/XUHwppVOAoeiczfioRV4w5SyRPnIF8QMTChbpzgrHWH6rdWAqrAhZpS7nVc5nH Kzp5xPePYiYUw/G8LDqbXGo/zvEwQ+C3yHHymqIRx3SXXc8kW/ynhow0yRPwM//I6WDe PK2guhizQOA+xHVV8X9eOi7R+l8y2xJ9bsmDzTAXTH2CGJbih/QApsJ2xzA9gD8S7p1l DlYFeN7LOsmDqUO89JoWbDNFFJ/oQeOCT+SY7ox2GnWkgFysts/Bsf35fsT16081g9sV K33ibghdh6WtewDe+YH+gjqqpFwryDfyKB8KycpPXMkwGlCi0+WcJO0w9Vhco7ubIFFW qamg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ioO5ugKEgQLxUE9drcCuOTRDrW3Q3YzFn7kVXyitf8hyKssjh vND3Z29CpxGlwp6kXBsTcwewvyzolTIuyQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznVBbl3CAy5HZ//whpo7S3ASn1DshTuCTR9Q5zdob4A8mBs29BrIBcxy+Ur9E8QEh3Z8SwoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1a92:b0:1b9:8094:446b with SMTP id ng18-20020a17090b1a9200b001b98094446bmr3975720pjb.93.1645048868667; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1005:b501:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p4sm6167722pgh.53.2022.02.16.14.01.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Feb 2022 14:01:08 -0800 (PST)
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
References: <164504605737.5780.6077978787283129045@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <766a9539-004c-bc25-1e23-ad1c960acacb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 11:01:03 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <164504605737.5780.6077978787283129045@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/2Ruo00dwVcTsAxHlnqUhHP5ixJ8>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-carpenter-rfced-iab-charter-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 22:01:13 -0000
Hi Yoav,
Thanks for the review.
I have no strong feelings about the security wording, so
I'll wait for advice from the AD.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 17-Feb-22 10:14, Yoav Nir via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Yoav Nir
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
>
> The document is ready. It's concise and does just what it's supposed to,
> nothing more. That's always good for security.
>
> The security considerations section reads, "This document should not affect the
> security of the Internet." I'd go even further and state that it in fact does
> not affect the security of the Internet. Documents published by the RFC
> editor's new model might, although they might affect it for the better as well
> as for the worse.
>
>
>
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-carpent… Yoav Nir via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-car… Brian E Carpenter