Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Fri, 14 February 2014 18:28 UTC
Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B33B1A03DB; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:28:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JI-YfCqYq7C; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.gondrom.org (www.gondrom.org [91.250.114.153]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6A21A03D3; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-No-Relay: not in my network
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=c9nI/1DNZ46On3cdTiz4zR2k22F+AG8vhyRYC55XfCcKfhAcAtJ9AhHt5zl10qt/ExBJykNxiGemLPsU9v7IQrCITbcBk968J8osZVz6kw/xAttR5h4uXTew+LmuqIR54Lh31a5B24y1jVZW1GZ41UA17h7IAk6J6uLk1oAw03w=; h=X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type;
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (2e40e8bc.skybroadband.com [46.64.232.188]) by www.gondrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9A0315390014; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:28:36 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52FE6054.3050705@gondrom.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:28:36 +0000
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ogud@ogud.com
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <52101187.2060409@gondrom.org> <5293E22B.90705@gondrom.org> <52E93A6B.9020400@gondrom.org> <19D1C94B-B284-45D6-AFDE-A1781B633F72@ogud.com>
In-Reply-To: <19D1C94B-B284-45D6-AFDE-A1781B633F72@ogud.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040108020603080208040102"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/2jJTt3MwtWUBQNsslFhasKVD3lo
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms.all@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:28:44 -0000
Thank you. Yes, your reply answers all my questions. Thanks and all the best, Tobias On 14/02/14 18:14, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > Thanks Tobias for the review > > On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:29 PM, Tobias Gondrom > <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org <mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>> wrote: > >> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's >> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the >> IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the >> security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat >> these comments just like any other last call comments. >> >> >> The document is basically just about acronyms to simplify DANE >> conversations >> The document appears ready for publication. >> >> The security consideration section is sufficient and there are no >> security issues with this document. >> >> There are only two small nits / spelling issues: >> in section "Abstract": >> - s/Experience has show that/Experience has shown that > > Fixed >> - speaking of acronyms, the first mention of TLSA should spell it out. > > I added: > (TLSA is not an acronym but a name ) > >> Thank you and best regards. >> >> Tobias > > Hope this addresses your concerns > > Olafur >
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-s… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-json-rfc… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-json-rfc… Paul Hoffman
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registr… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-reg… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-reg… Tobias Gondrom