[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-03
Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 16:33 UTC
Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E44F12950F; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w8ENdN_Tg-5A; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB814129428; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E5928B0041; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:33:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281E21F8036; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:33:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_594057DF-7220-4D31-A6BB-F1FEF5D4B6CC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:32:59 -0400
Message-Id: <D3C3DB5E-1CF0-4E6B-AE11-837A15E2E407@tislabs.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/2sVqSQ3rczjNQ8Z9C206caPJ2Jo>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:33:16 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft draft-ietf-regext-epp-rdap-status-mapping identifies gaps in the mapping of EPP statuses to RDAP statuses that are registered in the IANA RDAP JSON Values Registry. The draft provides entries in the RDAP JSON Values Registry to fill those gaps. I see no security issues with this draft. —Sandy
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-regext-epp-r… Sandra Murphy