Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 12 June 2013 09:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436E821F9A3F; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.131, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W-b-XHpBAfZR; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87921F9A6F; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273412CC60; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:30:58 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uavm5b2uptA3; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:30:56 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D111F2CC3C; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:30:56 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6D@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:30:56 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <437CC7FC-727A-428C-96F3-B8F887536AFA@piuha.net>
References: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930C049D6C6D@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
To: "Waltermire, David A." <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:31:04 -0000
Dave: Thanks for the review! Jari On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:54 PM, "Waltermire, David A." <david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > This draft, a proposed update to RFC 2050, documents current policies and processes used in the Internet Numbers Registry System for the assignment of the Internet Protocol (IP) address space and autonomous system (AS) numbers. It does not propose any changes to the Internet Numbers Registry System. > > After reviewing this informational document I do not have any security-related concerns. > > Sincerely, > Dave Waltermire >
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc2050bi… Waltermire, David A.
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc20… Russ Housley
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-housley-rfc20… Jari Arkko