[secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 31 January 2013 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505BD21F8C2A; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:04:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nhNib-BHozVN; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (mail2.ihtfp.org [IPv6:2001:4830:143:1::3a11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F176F21F8440; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:04:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FDA260239; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:04:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11270-04; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (unknown [IPv6:fe80::224:d7ff:fee7:8924]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C89E260023; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r0VM3xoh006128; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:03:59 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:03:58 -0500
Message-ID: <sjmwqutovqp.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: ogawa.kentaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, chuanhuang_li@zjsu.edu.cn, ehalep@ece.upatras.gr, forces-chairs@tools.ietf.org, wmwang@zjsu.edu.cn, joel.halpern@ericsson.com
Subject: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:04:15 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

   This document defines basic classes of Logical Function Blocks (LFBs)
   used in the Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES).  The
   basic LFB classes are defined according to ForCES FE model and ForCES
   protocol specifications, and are scoped to meet requirements of
   typical router functions and considered as the basic LFB library for
   ForCES.  The library includes the descriptions of the LFBs and the
   XML definitions.

The Security Considerations section offloads itself to RFC3746.

It is unclear to me if any of the new functions defined in the LFB
need any additional authentication or authorization, and if so I do
not see how that would be added.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant