IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-03

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 14 September 2015 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551E51A87A6 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WL408SlWygQr for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-f171.google.com (mail-yk0-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0DED1B2E45 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdg206 with SMTP id g206so167437701ykd.1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cv/PysJo2CME3tlo2w/aM9hJEsTsXnwnTSb/9ijeH8g=; b=EUyCrlxEmaSgoh75PNYw8/bJpDG5G1YSddhnjKaLZsLvkE04HYQ4UluHBcarGWnK/0 JinOjczEmtRJ6D2umz+gAYPjjmkzRN8g/JHLnpyUUFWJAzxHb06gBiYWWFiXhp1UTN+T QEwlJi0+ABH82GWs7E7rJZ34Ki0sDMRUVNObSQ4pRzMR91onPbOKRGNhVr6sHuV9INuz GuNgGNxebozJjq49aYPYoatr7BV+Z8C2J3CY1DTq2E1s41csUbCM7RIiftF+zCkUXkIe EZ6FARCPO8xoM2cUIhKDasIzHZk7RxVDAWfTjMOhzujQk5QOhc7eByimZZgvTqN80ZDt 65hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldx/CD1isGGcoSg5TsADAYYwlwUMCi/aWmSx9hwCgY2w9CiKPhjLlqd62gaE1bJA9SOcHD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.124.8 with SMTP id x8mr17111642ywc.44.1442269375888; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.52.135 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AE8A20C8-728C-4758-A9C3-3AB2FC3A2B2E@vpnc.org>
References: <CANTg3aAPYVTHzLLDNBKCpikCFREqHSpsAe_vHm8Z7LVTjSKyCg@mail.gmail.com> <138F09FC-109C-410E-ACA7-2DADF3D4460D@vpnc.org> <55F7078E.2070802@bogus.com> <AE8A20C8-728C-4758-A9C3-3AB2FC3A2B2E@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 18:22:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKdvYbrGs=nN8dc0-sW8W9-PA7vJV3mU0GZhfCW9djK+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11493a2cd23677051fbc81cf"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/3QUqhQ5CEFjXQWhSSOzwe2GWWCA>
Cc: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:22:59 -0000

Thank you Paul for taking care of this...

W

On Monday, September 14, 2015, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> On 14 Sep 2015, at 10:44, joel jaeggli wrote:
>
> > On 9/14/15 8:17 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >> Thanks! We have made these changes in the pre-draft of -04. If the ADs
> >> want us to publish this before the IESG review, we can; otherwise, we'll
> >> wait until after the IESG review to release them.
> >
> >
> > It's fine by me if you do that. no reason not to be dicsussing the
> > latest version so long as we have a few days between the update and the
> > review call.
>
> OK, we'll do a new rev soon then.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email