IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews

Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org> Fri, 08 May 2020 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ddp@electric-loft.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904473A00E2 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXipKRe79-bc for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Mail1.Yoyodyne.COM (mail1.yoyodyne.com [IPv6:2604:4ec0:1000::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 96FA13A00DC for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 16:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3024:1767:6000:f17b:2f7d:43e6:c1b2] ([2603:3024:1767:6000:f17b:2f7d:43e6:c1b2]) by Mail1.Yoyodyne.COM via Internet for <secdir@ietf.org> (and others); Fri, 8 May 2020 16:53:27 PDT
From: Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <F9C3BBE9-D04A-482E-966F-050C2F0A6A97@akamai.com> <87BD6B82-8CDD-4392-B928-C3A9AFD36B87@electric-loft.org>
Message-ID: <f0847592-af72-61dc-99ac-14c081c09a8d@electric-loft.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 16:53:48 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87BD6B82-8CDD-4392-B928-C3A9AFD36B87@electric-loft.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/3TBLa0hRus-gY_7DVosS4zQJI54>
Subject: Re: [secdir] AD's acknowledging reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 23:54:00 -0000

I did, I just don't think forcing the AD to generate the ack is useful. 
If it was anything other than okay or has nits, that might be nice, 
agreed.  Just my 2c.

On 5/8/2020 4:01 PM, Derrell Piper wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 8, 2020, at 1:38 PM, Salz, Rich 
>> <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org 
>> <mailto:rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I have asked about this twice before, and have never received an AD 
>> response. Perhaps third time’s the charm.
>> After a secdir review is done, and after any comment threads have died 
>> down, it would be polite for the responsible AD to acknowledge the 
>> review and indicate what they are planning on doing. Alissa does this 
>> for gen-art directorate reviews, 
>> seehttps://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/AKp-b-S4B_ITv8EKg_UgD1wBh3k/for 
>> an example.
> 
> For threads that have a lot of comments, I wouldn’t want to see the AD 
> have to ack all reviews.
> 
> Derrell
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email