Re: [secdir] [Jmap] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-core-12

"Neil Jenkins" <> Wed, 09 January 2019 04:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBC7129AB8 for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.983
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.717, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=RQ/JJz2J; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.b=P+mxVNDZ
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBpesocKDqnU for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0EFC12872C for <>; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal []) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C57253F9; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 23:29:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap7 ([]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Jan 2019 23:29:04 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from :to:cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=4COrQRrySv0uE+flbbsOIHB/5 4nRpW6stTypyEQRUAE=; b=RQ/JJz2JUnKLKTweEowoG/iPWuXcPTu/1/GLF1I2M dVwldYs+JkxuO5iEhnZ/ez2h7zyWzh5PPlevL62kr9LXQxsWG3Jv31uce2cAIRUe y5EBAnzGOOt3GS7M5SHraOKq/WUwhy/yfJZbn92Js5L2IVISkI3EvW7+P9X3811e R1WPpLNQdT7gYaPfa8SqbCpEPavRqnOHMQ8EV9dI6kvgbcpqpxxciaULu/sOwR/y sLz455R5WPXZN/pBAXF9i90cLLLCsECUZa4S1Kk5vsN7FWR5a7v90uL8cAR/O9dJ GdpC9el1gXuz+Mt9GC74PBnxtnmNVFWP+YWdeTVNojI/g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=4COrQRrySv0uE+flb bsOIHB/54nRpW6stTypyEQRUAE=; b=P+mxVNDZJq3Doip5NTqtqa5Ly2KrYJtxw SK4TEamxk00C4sya0D6jlGSd0PJvRUdYObMaZJT1eLPJ5Cp8Bk08Qwka5sO9ZuEP Hp+TGATb3a0Ep6VCRV1Nv+MAdeLfXw0/dVDx0cJP31n4DJJqKGd05YOiZ4ieY6rA 9VuWGXd+O8CYYuE8uhfxr1+U6WXc5yFmYGEJ2YDYA8hWYZsXZ5Fyat3H2ffYmtZK 6ebGTGHEMdnVHBBkOGkLOZdqwRT4+sFrBHmepKk6xIrwcQhlmuN03P1i2UNWoNx3 2B53Q61sbC0V9QzSlOh8PgkmqjpCnFnuYqe/qt/XZVglJV4Hky5HA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:kHg1XBBTkYnRCrjBjOOTqNpAyXpPrSD-qkUnljpL2xdFdt2JCcRpaA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfedtgdejfeculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtderreerreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfpfgvihhl ucflvghnkhhinhhsfdcuoehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqne curfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnvghilhhjsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdr tghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedu
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:kHg1XAsRZNNa_jGy-EomCTv3B06RhTxmzUskkJ6HOp5-9ByNUBj3NA> <xmx:kHg1XNANyg1u9JPsGzZyu-3PXw-Hnlf5HbzF5Cv_ANhc9K3mEEKNOg> <xmx:kHg1XFJFfP8DIbOnX8VnoUw5e4UGXAQytnFp3lz90ABZLBuBHhdvUw> <xmx:kHg1XPf0WQiSG7Ke9YkwYmmtuKAb5qffdkn-rh1onl6OPt9ETXC0XQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 20EAF203F1; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 23:29:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-739-g7452a1e-fmstable-20190103v1
X-Me-Personality: 64588216
Message-Id: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 23:29:03 -0500
From: "Neil Jenkins" <>
To: "Tero Kivinen" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=1b94715f4b6f49dfbebb226935b19301
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [secdir] =?utf-8?q?=5BJmap=5D___Secdir_last_call_review_of_draft?= =?utf-8?q?-ietf-jmap-core-12?=
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 04:29:06 -0000

On Wed, 9 Jan 2019, at 7:24 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> *Neil:* is this something which you feel strongly enough to insist on keeping?

I've gone back to the original email to try to see what the original comment was, before we digressed into arguing over whether people are able to share individual mailboxes or not. As far as I can see the paragraph that raised the issue was this in section 1.6.2:

*A single set of credentials may provide access to multiple accounts, for example if another user is sharing their mail with the logged in user, or if there is a group account.*

And Tero would like to see the word *mail* changed to *calendar*? I mean, sure that can work equally well as an example. I don't really see the need for the change, but if that resolves the issue I'm happy to change it. *Tero* – can you please let me know what change you are looking for if it's more than this.