[secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-07

⌘ Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> Mon, 06 July 2015 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mamille2@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF6B1A8876; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 04:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aaGBYAp7VrLW; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 04:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29771A0276; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 04:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1316; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436182180; x=1437391780; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=hQful7zokYZfgrdlpmYUT8BwM8qdAhpVP4QaLWmQUIo=; b=biwqldnVTqt3NZkyOx7KsUffaXJZ+7hfgnT7b45M32yAWn9+73h6OtJ8 NclrxWx1qInOhrkCMohfb3QEmTtEFfSw4JcSPinQZ1dXp8avIpR49w0Wm gYz0w4gs8T5pep/nogz8hPv4gPNXW8ikYKKTHRjkUwva/unZMCtMFZpDK o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DxAwAvZZpV/40NJK1cgxJUYAaDGbo3CYFmhy44FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRNVTYCBRYLAgsDAgECATUWAQwGAgEBiCqyWZVyAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBARgEgSGOTREBg0CBQwWNCIQpgmSEYocGgTqEFYJtkBomggsdgXJQgQ06gQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,414,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="12937377"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jul 2015 11:29:40 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t66BTdE9021021 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 11:29:40 GMT
Received: from [10.89.10.75] (10.89.10.75) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (173.36.12.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 06:29:39 -0500
Message-ID: <559A66A3.4010006@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:29:39 -0600
From: =?UTF-8?B?4oyYIE1hdHQgTWlsbGVy?= <mamille2@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF Security Directorate <secdir@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment.all@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.89.10.75]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/5MLqnp08X3dlsH90Hzo2tE5Ux2k>
Subject: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 11:29:42 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

[ resending with the correct email addresses.  Please ignore any
previous message from me with the same subject. My apologies for the
confusion ]

Hello all,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments that arrive in
timely manner, and not significantly belated.

OVERALL:

This document is ready.

DETAILS:

I have no concerns with the document.


- -- 
- - m&m

Matt Miller < mamille2@cisco.com >
Cisco Systems, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVmmajAAoJEDWi+S0W7cO17akIAJTj1KPO3TjzeZIJ2KLsgwVM
6L3WhnE0Yr24fBwg+NoDVVX1ZbRtDQ8SGElR64UvuRZ3WGvw3JHTqhS0IdEIVNij
dX75e+tMTCQULJIJSNTSh/OkyymK1/78mYB2OimlVm3gFWtuGgzHz+gSk4k4KAbV
UItoSMhBU3BuMQVLTezJ9WD1GDck7yVlaV3wc25AiT0hGfIu6HirokD+fb1cFVhj
Ay/meYdcY28Nnd5TfHYCcYLMUbA/G0HT3g36mTjgbwaeS+3yFXihBR0mjn59A6zx
m21fzsI6gFSeH9W03Ub2NwX01666RwYBB09jxFt8tpTX0iW3Osz/RNPnylOefaM=
=23Oa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----