[secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-sieve-autoreply-02

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Wed, 01 December 2010 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132673A6407; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:55:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KTxYtj7tjuUs; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 223163A6359; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 12:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F4B2602AB; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:56:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06031-05; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pgpdev.ihtfp.org (IHTFP-DHCP-100.IHTFP.ORG [192.168.248.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31513260245; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by pgpdev.ihtfp.org (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id oB1KuQlL011523; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:56:26 -0500
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:56:25 -0500
Message-ID: <sjmhbex9pqe.fsf@pgpdev.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: robinsgv@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, sieve-chairs@tools.ietf.org, Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com
Subject: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-sieve-autoreply-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:55:28 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

   This document describes how the Sieve email filtering language, along
   with some extensions, can be used to create automatic replies to
   incoming electronic mail messages based on the address book and
   presence information of the recipient.

The security considerations section details many potential issues with
automated responders.  One attack that it does not mention is the
potential for using the auto-responder as an oracle, in particular if
the system is using any public key cryptographic methods.  An attacker
could, theoretically, use the auto-responder to perform timing attacks.

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant