IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 15 April 2016 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D7012D13C; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LS9B1UqxtZ9v; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE8712D67C; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 03:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79f26d00000327e-f0-5710c13c21d4
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.33]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 53.19.12926.C31C0175; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:23:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.87] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:23:51 +0200
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>
References: <F3AF3182-F31A-4EF8-8DC5-54B27B6ADC05@sn3rd.com> <bfbe20ee1196a22eadd854ce7090ffc7@nestor.otaverkko.fi> <2A372E02-DC5C-4791-91D8-20D4949D6383@sn3rd.com>
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <5710C137.30305@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 13:23:51 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2A372E02-DC5C-4791-91D8-20D4949D6383@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7oq7tQYFwg3fnWSy+z7jLbDHjz0Rm i627P7FaXFnVyGzxYeFDFgdWj9V3pT2WLPnJ5HHwIKPHl8uf2QJYorhsUlJzMstSi/TtErgy vu/7yVowja2i+X4fawPjE5YuRk4OCQETiVUzpzBB2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjCKDHrwF1WCGcN o8TEqw1gVcICFhLP32xkA7FFBNwlJtx8xQRRtIJRonvBLXaQBLNAksS/KRvAbDaghi237oOt 4xXQlJi5eRFQAwcHi4CqxJv56SBhUYEYicYHp5ggSgQlTs6EuI5TwFZiZ+d7sHJmoNb1u/Qh pstLNG+dzQxiCwloSyx/1sIygVFwFpLuWQgds5B0LGBkXsUoWpxanJSbbmSsl1qUmVxcnJ+n l5dasokRGNoHt/xW3cF4+Y3jIUYBDkYlHt6EZoFwIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8TPuAQrwpiZVV qUX58UWlOanFhxilOViUxHmzI/+FCQmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWSZODilGhj9ipyqZP+eDDXOnKEf cKuQe87dynNbJzI3lzU1m7jZNfTNujjxZo/wGhGrfw9vRca/ePnhk9wOcx+ePCnd+wcmRlzN +G8SUZTrZSU+haMn9jHjvBv5C689eiUWxTFLruL6kbzAH68uZLxV2Tkn12lmbpO/5NtFz059 2XhExXPBieTw7TMEGqcrsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAmkHDN2kCAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/5oToJuwKJALw3onaa_bTnfi_jrA>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:24:02 -0000

Hi Samu,

could you please revise the draft accordingly?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 10/04/2016 2:54 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder:
> 
>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 08:47, Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi> wrote:
>>> Nits:
>>>
>>> nit 1: I read this a couple of times:
>>>  CERT parameters with the same Cert group number
>>>  in the group field indicate a logical grouping.
>>> Isn’t it that the same group # is in the Cert group field:?
>>>  CERT parameters with the same number
>>>  in the Cert group field indicate a logical grouping.
>>
>> Is this about missing CERT word in the group field? Or did I misunderstand this question?
> 
> Yeah this is completely editorial; I think “Cert” is just in the wrong place.  Might be wrong.
> 
> spt
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email