[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-02
Joseph Salowey via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 19 March 2022 19:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FAA3A1015; Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joseph Salowey via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.46.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <164771978277.7485.4774498116077094472@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 12:56:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/6mx7R3vkH5HHWADmRrDuY4OL-zw>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:56:23 -0000
Reviewer: Joseph Salowey Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is ready. The document provides a description of deployed IPv6 translation mechanisms for IPv4 as a services. I originally marked this document as has issues because it is incomplete as the security tradeoffs of these mechanisms are to be analyzed in separate documents. Since the document points to a defined methodology for assessing security of these mechanisms and one mechanism has been reviewed I feel there is enough there that makes it reasonable to believe this work will complete. I would like to understand if the additional security reviews are in progress and are being tracked by the working group.
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6… Joseph Salowey via Datatracker