Re: [secdir] this doc needs work
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 05 July 2012 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C150221F86B8 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1IHPP3FNeuv for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A186321F8661 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-227.bbn.com ([128.89.89.227]:49172) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1SmrRf-0007FK-88 for secdir@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:10:31 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240810cc1b96e2299d@[128.89.89.227]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240808cc1b72007771@[128.89.89.227]>
References: <p06240808cc1b72007771@[128.89.89.227]>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 15:10:28 -0400
To: secdir@ietf.org
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [secdir] this doc needs work
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 19:10:20 -0000
Paul pointed out that I should have copied the doc authors, WG chairs, and cognizant AD on my review, consistent with normal SECDIR practice. I have now done so. Steve
- [secdir] this doc needs work Stephen Kent
- Re: [secdir] this doc needs work Stephen Kent