Re: [secdir] Discussion from the Security Directorate

Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BDB3A6860 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.451, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YK2vg14z+rxD for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0503A67D7 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KNL00H7EBCRBM@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for secdir@ietf.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:19:40 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.6]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KNL00IYKBCR5Z@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for secdir@ietf.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:19:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dhcp-1313.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1313.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.19]) by szxml02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KNL005ASBCKSQ@szxml02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:19:39 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:19:30 +0200
From: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <7A7BC0A59F89445F9C385328@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Message-id: <78B348B3-0F13-4751-BDF9-2A9B8CAC8587@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04018CF83B@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <B40EE4C2-93AE-45A3-89AA-8601BFC76346@huawei.com> <633E561F-48D1-42DE-A310-9E77DB0A87F1@cisco.com> <4A6D98AC.4060100@bogus.com> <5AECC74E-90A0-45DA-9D23-7DE64F3488CB@cisco.com> <04f701ca102f$3e6d2c90$7958404e@china.huawei.com> <4C4D74B8-10FA-458E-93E4-37EE48F9D386@cisco.com> <10275_1248881187_n6TFQQhM022941_50F560B9-787C-4B90-903B-28F27E67CF85@huawei.com> <7A7BC0A59F89445F9C385328@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Joe Abley <jabley@ca.afilias.info>, 6man-ads@tools.ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, Behave Chairs <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, v6ops-ads@tools.ietf.org, softwire-ads@tools.ietf.org, behave-ads@tools.ietf.org, Softwire Chairs <softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Discussion from the Security Directorate
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:29:59 -0000

On Jul 29, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

> --On Wednesday, July 29, 2009 05:23:53 PM +0200 Tina  
> <tena@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Fred and David,
>> The slides were sent to OPS ADs, and we discussed it a bit in OPS-DIR
>> work lunch on Monday. According to the suggestion from Dan, I  
>> forwarded
>> the slides to the WG chairs of v6ops and opsec.
>
> Who sent them to the OPS AD's?  This is the first I've heard of  
> this, and certainly others on the security directorate seem to be in  
> the same boat. Some context would be nice...
>
> -- Jeff
>
I sent the slides to OPS AD's. In the first email Fred send to you  
about this subject, you could see the email history.

Tina