[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-05
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 07 June 2011 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4DD11E8112; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kcqk6fh-uFIy; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1733111E80F0; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6692034A; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:19:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id C86A14426; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:23:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour@tools.ietf.org
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:23:49 -0400
Message-ID: <tsl62oh7ji2.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-pcn-sm-edge-behaviour-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:23:55 -0000
I've reviewed this draft for the security directorate. This draft specifies the PCN protocol for the mode in which only a single mark is present. This protocol operates among a set of nodes trusted to enforce PCN behavior and to properly police traffic entering and leaving the network. This document referrs to a previous RFC for security considerations. The considerations documentedseem adequate, and for that reason I have no comments on this document. Had I been assigned the previous RFC, I might have had more comments, but we've already reached consensus on that document and published it, so let's move forward.