[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08
Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 02 August 2024 18:39 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.66] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C14EC14F5E6; Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kyle Rose via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172262394218.84165.7103365413162997369@dt-datatracker-6dd76c4557-2mkrj>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 11:39:02 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: PMTXYYR7BHOOLJ3MAOMJKEEACPVW6Z2W
X-Message-ID-Hash: PMTXYYR7BHOOLJ3MAOMJKEEACPVW6Z2W
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ace@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-ace-revoked-token-notification-08
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/82Rc_TtvfeBS3F6mO8Y36xDeYk8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Kyle Rose Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This is a re-review following my original review from 4/1/2024. This document is Ready. Marco has addressed my concerns in subsequent revisions. In particular, clarifying in the text that deciding why some token might be in or out of a TRL is out-of-scope for this document. That might suggest attention be paid elsewhere in the ecosystem where such concerns might still be relevant and actionable, while respecting the inherent limitations of the constrained environments at the core of ACE.
- [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-aceā¦ Kyle Rose via Datatracker