[secdir] README: Change in review deadlines
Samuel Weiler <weiler+secdir@watson.org> Mon, 03 August 2009 14:04 UTC
Return-Path: <weiler+secdir@watson.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69283A6E1B for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.67
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.67 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.930, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G7QFmSSgMefQ for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECF03A6DFD for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n73E3h56073072 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:03:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler+secdir@watson.org)
Received: from localhost (weiler@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n73E3hHC073069 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:03:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from weiler+secdir@watson.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: weiler owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:03:43 -0400
From: Samuel Weiler <weiler+secdir@watson.org>
X-X-Sender: weiler@fledge.watson.org
To: secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908030935350.50532@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:03:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [secdir] README: Change in review deadlines
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: secdir-secretary@mit.edu
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:04:23 -0000
Summary: please complete last call reviews by the end of the last call. Details: based on feedback from doc authors and the IESG, the ADs announced in Stockholm that they would prefer our initial reviews be sent by the end of IETF last call. That way, our comments can be processed along with any other last call comments and aren't an unpleasant late surprise to doc editors. We previously asked for reviews within seven days, though most of us were in the habit of letting that slip, often until the doc appeared on telechat. Most last calls are at least two weeks and often four weeks. Depending on how the last call announcement and assignment cycles interact, this means that we should have at least one week and usually more to get the review done. To facilitate this, we have added a deadline field to the review assignment messages. This should list the last call end date (or, for docs scheduled on an IESG telechat, the Tuesday before the telechat), but there may be errors in some of the dates, especially for older documents. Feel free to check the last call announcement to be certain. Also, since there were no assignments made during the Stockholm meeting, some of you are getting assignments of docs with last calls ending in the next few days. Knowing that this is a change in practice, feel free to take a week to get those done. I may also be shifting the assignment schedule somewhat to allow more time for reviews. Expect to see some variation. If you'd like more visibility into your secdir assignments and history, I can give you access to the review assignment tool. Just drop me a note. (Despite an announcement about this at San Francisco, we didn't open the tool up for experimentation then.) And we're adding a few new members: Tina TSOU is on the list now, and Russ Mundy will be joining us soon. As always, let me know when you're going to be offline for an extended period, particularly if you're in the next few names in the rotation. -- Sam
- [secdir] README: Change in review deadlines Samuel Weiler