[secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-07
Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru> Wed, 02 April 2025 06:31 UTC
Return-Path: <svan@elvis.ru>
X-Original-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4F9163DD7F; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elvis.ru
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrU5mLGO0trR; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dpmail.elvis.ru (dpmail.elvis.ru [93.188.44.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25527163DD7A; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elvis.ru; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+tI+JzYcGYTjx7NZ63/2aZog55nnhDtHXcqOoEq3npE=; b=VQJ+ebZ3Bs7sad2Y/tk2xgxFwO vKrcLPEGRq2JLq7thKsEyD3idfVhd0LBXuCdwGpV2B48DdqlYpfvmJ9og1rBxXloLp2L2LmN6klxJ tOjgJjzzGEhDyTUO0f5jlL3k3Czx36p1Py5SBigNPi/Q4brL8R7fDchbaR1qafPzDJ3U=;
Received: from kmail2.elvis.ru ([93.188.44.210]) by dpmail.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1tzrdc-0002aM-7T; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 09:31:48 +0300
Received: from mail.office.elvis.ru ([10.111.1.29]) by kmail2.elvis.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <svan@elvis.ru>) id 1tzrdc-0053j4-0K; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 09:31:48 +0300
Received: from MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:31:47 +0300
Received: from BuildPC (10.111.10.33) by MAIL16.office.elvis.ru (10.111.1.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1779.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:31:47 +0300
From: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
To: 'Carl Wallace' <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>, secdir@ietf.org
References: <174352621326.2417185.10124709164162264773@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
In-Reply-To: <174352621326.2417185.10124709164162264773@dt-datatracker-5b9b68c5b6-zxk6z>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 09:31:47 +0300
Message-ID: <05de01dba398$e921e230$bb65a690$@elvis.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHKAlJtB9R4/U7KoCIr4p7ne6hsOrOzILig
Content-Language: ru
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredBySendConnector: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: MAIL16.office.elvis.ru
X-Spam-Scanner: Rspamd work in kmail2.elvis.ru, WHITELIST
X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1
X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean
X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings
X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2023/02/21 22:47:00
X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2023/02/21 21:02:00 #20887462
X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped
X-Spam-Scanner: Rspamd work in dpmail.elvis.ru, WHITELIST
Message-ID-Hash: PWB3TBUIAUDLXZAJFBVIHTEO5QTG2MTP
X-Message-ID-Hash: PWB3TBUIAUDLXZAJFBVIHTEO5QTG2MTP
X-MailFrom: svan@elvis.ru
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt.all@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-qr-alt-07
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/8FOYd5ldcdPdaksy9IBw62oimBU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Carl, thank you for your review. > Reviewer: Carl Wallace > Review result: Ready > > The draft is a well-written and is ready as-is. > > Two minor nits. In the intro, change "by means of Post-Quantum Preshared Key" > to "by means of a Post-Quantum Preshared Key." Fixed. > For table 1, I think it'd be helpful > to define what '*' means. I see in some referenced drafts this same presentation is > used with no definition for *, so maybe in this idiom it's fine. This table is inspired by the table from RFC 8784, where it was used for the same purpose. We didn't explain what "*" meant there (actually, it meant "Any value" or "Does not matter"), so I'm not sure this table should give definition to it. I think that "*" is widely understood as "Any". Regards, Valery.
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ip… Carl Wallace via Datatracker
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Valery Smyslov