[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 30 May 2017 17:42 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A20F129C31; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, sacm@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.52.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <149616615640.19877.7389294095180042080@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:42:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/8oQa3ShCYwaJoF8mzGZ8tE0lcnQ>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-15
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:42:36 -0000
Reviewer: Barry Leiba Review result: Has Nits While I'm calling this document "ready", I really don't see why it should be published in the RFC series at all. It's well written, and it seems to be important material for the working group to use as it develops the SACM architecture, data model and transport protocols, but does not seem to be of lasting interest after those are done. I'd rather see it in the working group wiki, and used that way. That said, I know the working group wants it published and that my comment here is likely not to go far, so I'll say that if it's to be published as an RFC, it's ready. The one nit I note is that in the XML "title" element you appear to have abbrev="Abbreviated Title", rather than the more likely abbrev="SACM Requirements".
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-sa… Barry Leiba
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Kathleen Moriarty