[secdir] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22
"Carl Wallace" <CWallace@cygnacom.com> Thu, 28 May 2009 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <cwallace@cygnacom.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D427E3A69FC; Thu, 28 May 2009 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.571, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WY6jMDIuqImV; Thu, 28 May 2009 10:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p03c11o142.symantecmail.net (p03c11o142.symantecmail.net [208.65.144.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C9028C1A1; Thu, 28 May 2009 10:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [65.242.48.5] (EHLO scygexch1.cygnacom.com) by p03c11o142.symantecmail.net (mxl_mta-5.7.0-7) with ESMTP id 9ebce1a4.2169314224.53862.00-022.p03c11o142.symantecmail.net (envelope-from <cwallace@cygnacom.com>); Thu, 28 May 2009 11:37:45 -0600 (MDT)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9DFBB.01CB7C68"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:37:43 -0400
Message-ID: <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D48B90995@scygexch1.cygnacom.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22
Thread-Index: AcnfuwGF1zGJ2r6lRBqKiYTv54zhcw==
From: Carl Wallace <CWallace@cygnacom.com>
To: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, mark.davis@google.com, addison@inter-locale.com
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; S=0.200(2009052001)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <cwallace@cygnacom.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [65.242.48.5]
Subject: [secdir] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:36:23 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I don't see any issues with this draft. One question, has any consideration been given to posting a detached signature covering the registry, similar to what RFC 5485 describes for I-Ds?
- [secdir] draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-22 Carl Wallace