Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01

S Moonesamy <> Fri, 30 May 2014 22:22 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B63E1A0379; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.441
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxMTeBLwgRAp; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DC81A0262; Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4UMMUQp006917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1401488564; bh=67I5WXe1tL10Tt6T5NYcHikBhPp3AQUX+C0h2ZiObwk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=RG2QmtSZDhtNB89F36oLCWy8fL5F4/l42XS0usa8JB0gNqNfvohX1yTOasayqYjYg gqtFee6SyvJQHvVsgq2N+Q/P0hxBWtCbQjGodJerYUjSZj8XekuqtizIU675A4/MF9 qFnj7xnHnuYx4JSyUwkotoFCIwH88VXYKrLsBKQ8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1401488564;; bh=67I5WXe1tL10Tt6T5NYcHikBhPp3AQUX+C0h2ZiObwk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=2CIiRDw3+sxgdYIhQu30/Ahhu/wZUAxX5BuOCEyW1WZdF60MMbCeszbbg6oP+uZCy Ucndyws2wbx436D6QtvoPFJQ7lor5x55nemLZucHfCqHqfkM0m1g97Q63dErvBXvvA 6AluewFNfRA9qJyswbXfglBbIvb2vVDrgjwM0vdA=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:22:26 -0700
To: "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <>
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 22:22:56 -0000

Hi Joe,
At 13:42 30-05-2014, Joseph Salowey (jsalowey) wrote:
>[Joe] My concern is that there is not enough information in the 
>draft to know what goes into the hash that is the subject of the 
>code point assignment.  Perhaps it is obvious to someone who 
>implemented the SSH code that is not documented in this draft, but 
>it is not obvious to me as a reader of the draft.

That's a fair point.  I propose adding the following text in Section 
2 as a warning to the reader:

   The format of the ED25519 public key with SHA-256 fingerprint is
   not documented in an authoritative specification.

S. Moonesamy