[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt

Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com> Mon, 29 October 2012 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E4621F85FE; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAAGOS7R+YM5; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com (mtv-iport-3.cisco.com [173.36.130.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEF121F85F3; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:18:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=443; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1351538284; x=1352747884; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Op0sUQ0mVaqbU36BZeeMv+HYniAIarsZ68mrn57gccw=; b=LszbbxioWFSUKkLfi1IBAF93Em/RsxK5wQGfwgWFRreZPPxCy9XY5Vak F5Xnh0kaVWGue/AerA4VEVZs5p4p6DL/ODhY4149KYslocY8CNtN3yfwq yb/Y+co7SfU5a2z6+eP85+rSuLMf0qV2/wcU6klhxIenILneWGdzAPELM g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwEAIvVjlCrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEwwaBCII3ASUCgX40h2OcCZ9zklIDiFmbcoFrgw8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,673,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="60036688"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2012 19:17:55 +0000
Received: from sjc-xdm-114 (sjc-xdm-114.cisco.com [171.71.188.119]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9TJHtNl019965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:17:55 GMT
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping.all@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1210291211560.10140@sjc-xdm-114.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-pw-lsp-ping-03.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:18:04 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I didn't find any security related issues in this.
It all looks good to me.  :-)

Thanks,
Chris