[secdir] [new-work] WG Review: INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Tue, 06 March 2012 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <new-work-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACA121F88D0; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:16:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1331057803; bh=B89gznlswRU06CeT3aCBtiKgmOTwUk0jDBeShdSw8tA=; h=MIME-Version:From:To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=a0mLuRldS7Z5sXZhy5ssNg0Jj9M+zjieabH7PyPkk6eqEc7dH6BWxKju/4hsXw/AP 6ajpUm9SbyyjOv3YLm2xf8CJr4lRukXGGxfPIWStnivGt+W1GZC7OjovfWvewGUgPT rorBAv8Sxbx0UFVRvyJuGHp/x8dqu/tXYHwp5QeE=
X-Original-To: new-work@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: new-work@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6F621F88DF; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58ReJzzAvcTu; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8165021F88DA; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:16:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: new-work@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.00
Message-ID: <20120306181641.6343.29418.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:16:41 -0800
X-BeenThere: new-work@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-work-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: new-work-bounces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:37:31 -0800
Subject: [secdir] [new-work] WG Review: INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 18:16:44 -0000

A new IETF working group has been proposed in the Real-Time Applications and Infrastructure Area.  The IESG has not made any determination as yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg@ietf.org) by Tuesday, 13 March 2012.               

INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)
------------------------------------------
Status: Proposed Working Group
Last Updated: 2012-03-01

Chairs:
 TBD

Real-Time Applications and Infrastructure Area Directors:
 Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
 Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>

Real-Time Applications and Infrastructure Area Advisor:
 Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>

Mailing Lists:
 General Discussion: TBD
 To Subscribe:	TBD
 Archive:	TBD

An end-to-end session identifier in SIP-based multimedia
communication networks refers to the ability for endpoints,
intermediate devices, and management and monitoring system to
identify and correlate SIP messages and dialogs of the same
higher-level end-to-end "communication session" across multiple
SIP devices, hops, and administrative domains.  Unfortunately,
there are a number of factors that contribute to the fact that
the current dialog identifiers defined in SIP are not suitable
for end-to-end session identification. Perhaps the most important
factor worth describing is that in real-world deployments of
Back-to-Back User Agents (B2BUAs) devices like Session Border
Controllers (SBC) often change the call identifiers (e.g., the
From-tag and To-tag that are used in conjunction with the Call-ID
header to make the dialog-id) as the session signaling passes
through.

An end-to-end session identifier should allow the possibility to
identify the communication session from the point of origin,
passing through any number of intermediaries, to the ultimate
point of termination. It should have the same aim as the
From-tag, To-tag and Call-ID conjunction, but should not be
mangled by intermediaries.

A SIP end-to-end session identifier has been considered as possible
solution of different use cases like troubleshooting, billing, session
tracking, session recording, media and signaling correlation, and so
forth.  Some of these requirements come from other working groups
within the RAI area (e.g., SIPRec). Moreover, other standards
organizations have identified the need for SIP and H.323 to carry the
same "session ID" value so that it is possible to identify a call
end-to end even when performing inter working between protocols.

This group will focus on a document that will specify an SIP
identifier that have the same aim as the From-tag, To-tag and Call-ID
conjunction, but is less likely to be mangled by intermediaries. In
doing this work, the group will pay attention to the privacy
implications of a "session ID", for example considering the
possibility to make it intractable for nodes to correlate "session IDs"
generated by the same user for different sessions.

Goal and Milestone:

Dec 2012 - Specification of the new identifier sent to the IESG (PS)
_______________________________________________
new-work mailing list
new-work@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-work