Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr

David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com> Fri, 07 January 2011 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcgrew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB843A68D0; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:19:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REP+pdtBvtFN; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1AD3A67E9; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:19:56 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEALW+Jk2rRN+K/2dsb2JhbACkKHOjS5g4hUwEhGeGIoMe
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Jan 2011 15:22:03 +0000
Received: from [10.32.254.210] ([10.32.254.210]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p07FLnks022078; Fri, 7 Jan 2011 15:22:03 GMT
Message-Id: <60EE0BD1-AA8A-4C52-AF1A-DFEA2DFD59FB@cisco.com>
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@cisco.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73CFD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 07:22:03 -0800
References: <07F215F7-78DF-4B09-AF28-F75FF15FD9CD@cisco.com> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1341E73CFD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr@tools.ietf.org" <draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-kucherawy-authres-vbr
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:19:57 -0000

Hi Murray,

Looks good to me.

David

On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> How about this replacing the second paragraph of Section 1:
>
>   This memo thus registers an additional reporting property allowing a
>   VBR result to be relayed as an annotation in a message header.
>
> And at the end of Section 3, covering your Section 4 issues:
>
>   Reactions to the information contained in an Authentication-Results
>   header field that contains VBR (or any) results are not specified
>   here as they are entirely a matter of local policy at the receiver.
>
> -MSK