Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 03 February 2020 12:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B2E1200B2; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:31:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ph3f5Kn40S-I; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A229120098; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B6dJ0GXQz6GFdR; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:31:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1580733092; bh=caIxlNh9D9cAVpH/mgyJE4kkdnCpdwcMguOrlZgH/E0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=F/EjjX2S3MQBhY3r9L43QB3ISHQDbgsyksTgR7rOlqaI6HkqdKWpY6ixEP/Cf1pbI VnSsKXLbB6knfGZg/1p5QQPZurdYzFI1inYWaxI/cRazdtzoPHpt0PQAOGT3fYP9Gh UqhOQSfyhx9f9kKmn8eo8eHdW2UFuVBvK/+UCR9c=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.128.43] (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48B6dG6YHZz6GDWq; Mon, 3 Feb 2020 04:31:30 -0800 (PST)
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational.all@ietf.org
References: <158071519216.11324.2230466035276788626@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <0b6d11ec-4631-574e-972f-866a6627c33c@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 07:31:27 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158071519216.11324.2230466035276788626@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/APbdwNiDLvS2ikeJEYwoTi9DnRo>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-halpern-gendispatch-consensusinformational-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 12:31:33 -0000
Thank you Valery. Yours, Joel On 2/3/2020 2:33 AM, Valery Smyslov via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > Review result: Ready > > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat > these comments just like any other last call comments. > > The document doesn't describe any protocol, it only concerns with > IETF process. For this reason the document has no direct impact > on the security of IETF protocols. > > >
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-halpern… Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Joel M. Halpern