Re: [secdir] [payload] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

I do agree with Colin here (and with Ben and Robert) but...

On 09/04/15 10:58, Colin Perkins wrote:
> A document giving normative security guidance for unicast SIP-based
> telephony using RTP is something we need, I agree. I'm happy to help
> reviewing such a thing, but it should be authored by someone more
> familiar with the deployed security mechanisms.

I've just gotten offlist mail from another secdir reviewer who
noted that we had exactly the same discussion 7 years ago for
another payload document. And I recall it myself more recently.

So that unicast SIP/RTP document really would save us all some
time and might help those implementing and deploying security
stuff in such cases. (And even if folks were not implementing
or deploying security stuff for this 7 years ago, I would say
that it's much more likely they will be doing that today and
in future.)

S.