Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-04

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 09 October 2012 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB4821F876D; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdacGvdlyI6A; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22F121F8748; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so14047485iec.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=UG6CBRQE1Sh2tJQkNHsEHr1i0Sz2bQds4tSQ4XWNX5Q=; b=exVtELH/zUmxWGBiqgpIJAyERVvAaCdFOpfIgmcdPrNl2TF+RqBOoV8h89WtdEmor4 VjSfMxMFGVRLWl9V2SpVg43dGLg321bN21uN8wjW8AQKLyIcYdAbZQJbcgW4ISZqG1NK qyjEu99+VpjIgK0CZ9N5naWMWSmBukxC3+6puIgmcjmXUmovfOJ4z0hGTY/Pl1KHIBht b2dlN2GeCcPMVPUzOUoq09+WawiEgq8um9IYNrOz+Ura3drco842FY1h/Ulohw8ubKwG /st+MRiGNml2WoMZ9DMhpWkxNkIB7W9iroJwGpFqmcD0igR0bgYvHG3TegiSG1Lw2fuo CYTA==
Received: by 10.50.236.99 with SMTP id ut3mr2760733igc.73.1349809433076; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.113 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 12:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AEB91807EA0E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AEB91807EA0E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:03:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEGf5fLSdKzDKcbj2cn8D9h-uiZf8v_uOtiLZJnYWTnQ3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hanna <shanna@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis.all@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:03:54 -0000

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Hanna <shanna@juniper.net> wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
> just like any other last call comments.
>
> This draft describes the IANA Considerations for parameters related
> to the Domain Name System (DNS). It obsoletes RFC 6195, which
> performed essentially the same job. The document is well written and
> ready with nits (a few typos listed below). The Security Considerations
> section points out that this document relates to IANA Considerations
> and refers the reader to DNSSEC documents for more information on
> security issues related to DNS. This is a reasonable approach.

Thanks.

> The only nit that I saw was that in section 1.2 (Acknowledgement)
> "Alfred Hoenes contributions" should have an apostrophe after the
> name "Alfred Hoenes" since this is a possessive. You're referring
> to Mr. Hoenes' contributions. At least, that's how I interpret it.
> You might also want to change the section title to be plural since
> you include four names in the Acknowledgement section.

OK. I'm fine with those fixes.

Thanks,
Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com