[secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@apple.com> Wed, 02 December 2009 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@apple.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390393A69EE; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:07:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JDMX2LiTzAKD; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD343A6844; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800EE8140ED6; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:06:56 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807130-b7b0aae00000102c-cb-4b161210e68d
Received: from et.apple.com (et.apple.com [17.151.62.12]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 87.8F.04140.012161B4; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:06:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (99-52-202-108.lightspeed.snjsca.sbcglobal.net [99.52.202.108]) by et.apple.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KU0008KZJRJGK20@et.apple.com>; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:06:56 -0800 (PST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:06:54 -0800
Message-id: <56A9F347-A2C5-41BA-B9AB-03647388ED02@apple.com>
To: muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, akoba@nttv6.net, Thomas.Dietz@nw.neclab.eu
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1127)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAZE=
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:38:03 -0800
Cc: ipfix-chairs@tools.ietf.org, IESG - <iesg@ietf.org>, Security-Directorat Directorat <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review: draft-ietf-ipfix-mib-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:07:18 -0000

Hello all,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the  IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

ipfixSelectionProcessTable is left undefined, so it could possibly contain parameters that should not be exposed.

Other then that I didn't find any problems.

Love