Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A13133021; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yMDMuIfLdrgP; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDAB5132944; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=223026; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505388146; x=1506597746; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=YXpGABtLn7ymurUwRpn9B0u+mf1DynLB0ai1L/CFqZ0=; b=Ux+WEC1TZpsDxUjEk3DZJ4tdgg8vAtQ2A2dkssbrr/vuc5FNnz6IKm3F 9EkkaL01nv+rFFbIqX3dZNGSkqQ+fBvHyJf3eRNC0CBcnTpGYQ9bmRMdv no9Vwfz3koC6AgbShiVBuiXF9InnlFWc1JywaW+GEqr3p2CJtE1be/hcu c=;
X-Files: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-21-from-0.diff.html, ATT00001.htm, draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-21-from-0.wdiff.html, ATT00002.htm : 69741, 683, 87279, 1700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CTAQC7ZbpZ/51dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgy0tZG4nB4NwnTSPb4VOggQKI4E5AYNfAhqEBVcBAgEBAQEBAms?= =?us-ascii?q?ohRkGGgEIBEAEBwcQAgEIBA4bFQICAjAXDgIEDgUOiiQQrA6BbTqLNAEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4PgycEgWEBIIFQgWMrgXBYNYQzCggBCwcBBwItGA8?= =?us-ascii?q?BglSCYAWJew6HJYlWLoVQAoQ2giGBAYNag1iFRoITG0CFDYN+hTSBSYl/JIdsg?= =?us-ascii?q?nUCERkBgTgBV4ECC3cVShIBhQECAxyBZgF2hiwPF4EMgQ8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,392,1500940800"; d="htm'217?html'217,217?scan'217,217,208,217";a="3367799"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2017 11:22:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8EBML0A015029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:21 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:22:20 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 07:22:20 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
CC: "draft-ietf-sfc-nsh.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sfc-nsh.all@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18
Thread-Index: AQHTEvC/pwAKmK7nuE+363G/TDu7PaKqA5CAgAOkFQCABwz5gA==
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:20 +0000
Message-ID: <D59135F4-CEEC-4A0B-BA61-0126203710AC@cisco.com>
References: <2ad0274f-3385-136d-794b-082192393ebf@huitema.net> <C53DE35A-4043-46A5-8525-FF273F205971@cisco.com> <3dca9d3d-de38-602c-222f-e111ae7d16a0@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <3dca9d3d-de38-602c-222f-e111ae7d16a0@huitema.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.233.115]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_007_D59135F4CEEC4A0BBA610126203710ACciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Au42dr77B77kcbHt8Q5KMosowxQ>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-18
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:22:38 -0000

Christian,

We worked on a revision -21 attempting to address your follow-ups and remaining concerns.

In an effort to improve the review efficiency, we are sending the Diffs (HTML side-by-side and wdiffs) of that -21 candidate to a reduced audience.

We would absolutely appreciate all feedback, particularly concrete (read: actual textual recommendations) input whenever possible.

And of course we will get back to the larger lists after converging and posting a new revision.

Let us know — Thanks!