Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netmod-smi-yang-04

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAD621F86B2; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAfHf7PvHIbC; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C6521F86AD; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 06:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3PDkn18019721; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:46:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.86] (ams-bclaise-8915.cisco.com [10.60.67.86]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3PDkmpi010396; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:46:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4F980048.6050100@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:46:48 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>, draft-ietf-netmod-smi-yang.all@tools.ietf.org, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, Leif Johansson <leifj@nordu.net>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <4F853D62.1090204@sunet.se> <20120411091551.GA26732@elstar.local> <4F854E70.4060900@sunet.se> <20120411094234.GA26959@elstar.local> <4F855825.1090409@sunet.se> <4F97FB88.7020300@cisco.com> <20120425133337.GA87285@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20120425133337.GA87285@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-netmod-smi-yang-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:46:51 -0000

Thanks Juergen!

Regards, Benoit
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 03:26:32PM +0200, Benoit Claise wrote:
>
>> Do you plan on adding such an explanation in the draft, or at least
>> give pointers to the different RFCs?
> Benoit,
>
> I made some changes in the -05 version in the hope that this was
> sufficient. In particular, I am spelling out that the RFCs containing
> the SMIv2 data models contain a discussion of the sensitivity of the
> various objects and I added an explicite reference to the NETCONF
> access control model.
>
> /js
>