Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 28 April 2016 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF5D12D8A0; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5j0KzfrWkWY; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93A812D592; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6094; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461878996; x=1463088596; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=on68NVQkjy7sPplmm7XHwoUjtz6rVeuGB13S3KCDHl4=; b=ZLqqzGaRmzmMBj+jneHwAaF8wiJf4AsuMRE3oI9qKhJKUktRL+Eq/oYz Tm5VLVcYuej5dJ9jWBC5dBttZHx2C9fFvZIfEi0ZIoPu/YQbJDChDDCsK ET1OBp3WUW5iZyFph9ubw19MZqNSxPlLhj55002ZX4uhjG4eEWHDxVBeZ I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AHAwA6gCJX/4MNJK1egmxMgVAGtGiCZ?= =?us-ascii?q?IIPDoF2hg8CgSY4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RBAQEBAwEjVgULAgEIBBQqAgIyJQIEDgU?= =?us-ascii?q?OiBQIskeRLgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ0IhiGBdYJWhz0rgisFmBABg?= =?us-ascii?q?yeBZ4kIjxGPLwEeAUODa2yGaX8BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,548,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="101759455"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Apr 2016 21:29:55 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3SLTtCV015103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:29:55 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:29:54 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:29:54 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Thread-Topic: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02
Thread-Index: AQHRn7noe7HtbKiJG0u+NZfEBeLzNZ+ckJsAgAAJNACAATkFgIACO5QAgAAfZQA=
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:29:54 +0000
Message-ID: <43FF685A-36BB-4E24-BC00-E14197776E47@cisco.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwho5C8JzQ92Nk4mQjjhwKG0gvus=xH5G0e6s9smEg=DNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3uvJ+HOMvmgkCdn4dVQRHQus5XHSQd+RhDJTVpF1O5nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwi18cg66Yy_XY7QAOr0fBfC8oRY_2WTM_+NKu0xj08_Dw@mail.gmail.com> <57208701.2010209@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwiiBK4ZdT+CcF1nm240kAS4rgK71Pn9fmKG-53ssibBXg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwiiBK4ZdT+CcF1nm240kAS4rgK71Pn9fmKG-53ssibBXg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.58.232]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92D545E3-0B35-4874-A66D-A333FDD28582"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Awq40MeCIP4yct5yUcDrN-bfhT0>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv.all@ietf.org>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:29:59 -0000

Phillip,

It might be useful to updated the Subject line for the rest of the discussion.

Trying to focus the conversation on the current Subject, I am leaving the relevant sentence, and inserting a comment at the end.

> On Apr 28, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> 
> This document has the title 'psuedowire' in the title. The protocol it is describing creates a capability that has link-like nature.


This document, draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02, does not have “psuedowire” (nor “pseudowire”) in the title, and does not describe a protocol that creates a capability that has a link-like nature.

For reference:

CPIGNATA-M-H03V:seamless-vccv cpignata$ tail -n +12 draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt | head
                         Seamless BFD for VCCV
                    draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02

Abstract

   This document extends the procedures and Connectivity Verification
   (CV) types already defined for Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
   (BFD) for Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV) to define
   Seamless BFD (S-BFD) for VCCV.  This document updates RFC 5885,
   extending the CV Values and the Capability Selection.
CPIGNATA-M-H03V:seamless-vccv cpignata$

Thanks,

— Carlos.