Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Sat, 20 August 2016 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69A112D599; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.768
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.768 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-PAGKeCWRnk; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD9F12D5A4; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 20:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1529; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1471665069; x=1472874669; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=a/Lx4plgEYxP6C/Xh4LyfVWCyxPzR1+68GFDBQMWdbU=; b=ffFmKBlJ2n/Cx4qR4vS3pVina7TM2U+hj4FgDYR819mxDKpSa/6VFC52 GNW0knxTSOJh2UPuQPSdQl6tfo4piyR4v946n+ii9C7/n25olk1ijvYq8 7l+zkVNm5s/KRdlJexXLIPtJILVluXXx2AGJxDSKFUPqZ188Y9e0wWl9Y Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0B2AgAF07dX/5JdJa1eg0SBQw8Ht2yBf?= =?us-ascii?q?YYdAoFmOBQCAQEBAQEBAV4nhF4BAQQBOj8FCwIBCBQEFQkQMiUCBA4FiCkIuw4?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchiuBeAiCTYRAP4Jtgi8BBJlIAY8egW2NY?= =?us-ascii?q?4ZphVaDdwEeNoN6cIYvfwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,548,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="139735992"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2016 03:51:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7K3p8hv014071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 20 Aug 2016 03:51:08 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:51:07 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:51:07 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10
Thread-Index: AQHR+juMiP/AUxSdb0qspiGe1MjA96BRi4IA
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 03:51:07 +0000
Message-ID: <23C0BC86-C76B-4E33-8255-B6D9CDEFF444@cisco.com>
References: <e650aaa6-bb81-ef0a-fd74-5416014e1088@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e650aaa6-bb81-ef0a-fd74-5416014e1088@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.176.229]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B7464A504C5CFC4E8FD1890687780191@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/B0wBlk_mZ3fOIiR19uy3YtRVOXY>
Cc: "draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes.all@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 03:51:11 -0000

Thanks for the review, Matt.  You comment is duly notes.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


> On Aug 19, 2016, at 1:02 PM, Matt Miller (mamille2) <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments that arrived on time.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10
> Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
> Review Date: 2016-08-19
> IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-06
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document is ready for publication as a Standards Track document.
> 
> This document updates RFC 5764 to update the receiver's demultiplexing
> to account for all the known packet types, and explicitly updates the
> IANA registries that were previously implicitly impacted, including
> changes in allocations of the registries to require coordination.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> NONE
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> NONE
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> * This document uses "RFC XXXX" or "RFCXXXX" to, I assume, reference
> this document.  It may be worth calling this out explicitly for the
> RFC Editor, although I don't think this requires an update to this
> document.
> 
> 
> -- 
> - m&m
> 
> Matt Miller
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
>