[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-01

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Fri, 10 June 2011 06:13 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ECC21F8523; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0H5rHIi6Oz1; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7AA21F8522; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1903825gxk.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OXEE5ysUzNHy5wWINUBDi773Y8icR6W2fW01bvszjAI=; b=irr3MiVqUDETdG73xfGxXc9e8f8XAEigRahxwoyX8nOqMAJ5wmNfKR1GJiAtplwZ5J +rDeAoYyLLh8ADIdbnZTikXvErAndwuPIDd9L/xEbstck2dIdpQB0jkHgVJmLTv2oKa6 9U1dBvEjeOQcQUVXn8VML7MSnpH/07+qAm0pE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; b=cxc9nV+Z2sgYzsV59X6qc3b+amIQpySIDASFXUtwjlLdnarPGJ1criHNRexuy46B+b YbXwgsdxUtNVrypsDQciqm7c1AqJYtETgrlnLIbLDpUCoQr+AGXQDWSbwrSb53GC2qQu +5KEOjgGF7zWkct4oXxXgIp2fOpGeqFrZ1Wd4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.192.201 with SMTP id i49mr2123182yhn.525.1307686426570; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 23:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.236.42.200 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 02:13:46 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8N0VB5pJC2jDpq7EWfGkWw6rNg4
Message-ID: <BANLkTinwDBZtLnCDL7fWSGek=T7WGDaw2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 06:13:48 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This is an informational document that gives an overview of the "6to4"
tunneling mechanism, along with extensive operational advice for it.
The document is well written and clear, and the Security
Considerations section seems correct and adequate.  I see no issues
with this document.

Barry