[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 29 January 2014 17:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB981A02F2; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:29:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.535
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQXcI_inU-Ru; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.gondrom.org (www.gondrom.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FAD1A0216; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:29:20 -0800 (PST)
X-No-Relay: not in my network
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=P9h6WLvAGT4Szbd0Is2J/WQmwOqK6Nb34HYEUZIT5wG9KSVTQjbXFdzpPkrUE6Id1HQ5snPVeurRDSSY1dmE2rrHyqgbNPckCqbX0kIKglmWBSO3ftsOTcxzJm24+w7kj74GiWkggSw0+I8AUD+LBp5NXXMyi7dFJyfoicKD8f0=; h=X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:X-Priority:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type;
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
Received: from [] (2e40e864.skybroadband.com []) by www.gondrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E23B71539000D; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 18:29:15 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52E93A6B.9020400@gondrom.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:29:15 +0000
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms.all@tools.ietf.org
X-Priority: 4 (Low)
References: <52101187.2060409@gondrom.org> <5293E22B.90705@gondrom.org>
In-Reply-To: <5293E22B.90705@gondrom.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020800000602060106040409"
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:29:23 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The document is basically just about acronyms to simplify DANE
The document appears ready for publication.

The security consideration section is sufficient and there are no
security issues with this document.

There are only two small nits / spelling issues:
in section "Abstract":
- s/Experience has show that/Experience has shown that
- speaking of acronyms, the first mention of TLSA should spell it out.

Thank you and best regards.