[secdir] No secdir lunch in Prague

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 22 March 2019 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7228312D550 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.42
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RzLiMqg86Jsv for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526EF127873 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.acr.fi (localhost []) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x2MLKUeE024237 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:20:30 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.acr.fi (8.15.2/8.14.8/Submit) id x2MLKU4B018539; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:20:30 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23701.20894.682242.277408@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 23:20:30 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20190320160610.GH80498@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20190320160610.GH80498@kduck.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 25.1.1 (x86_64--netbsd)
X-Edit-Time: 8 min
X-Total-Time: 11 min
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/C5jTVCTVl3ULdcVTCEHjFw1_XzQ>
Subject: [secdir] No secdir lunch in Prague
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 21:20:36 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk writes:
> Hopefully Tero can send out a link to the statistics page so we can all see
> how we're doing.

I think the statistics pages are limited to secretary and perhaps ADs,
so I cannot really send out link.

But I think the statistics are about same than before, meaning slowing
getting better. During the last year, we have finished 113 reviews in
time, and 77 late. 35 reviews was not finished at all. This is out of
225 closed reviews in total making it so that we finish 50% of reviews
in time, and 34% late, and miss 15% of reviews. We used to have more
of dropped reviews but as we have been removing reviewers missing
several review request in a row, that will improve our statistics too.

Te statistics for review results are so that 29% of documents have
issues, 28% have nits and 42% are ready. For about 1% the result has
been "Not Ready".