IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 16 March 2021 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D973A1511; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4SGDcWDyJNo; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB963A14FE; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id m18so18701323vsa.1; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oZGnTSLJ0d/OVLtQLfrMwpRtm0fCQyymSkYFwGQmu6g=; b=Cwwz7ILW494pEJmYOHhRrv515J+MMxe09px/HGq1Au2hbtFH6SkVXoBZ6Hor53KHq+ KKgaMG14xAefLZj6NBgvMIux0d99/O+XfP3MRrvk3u2rzkN4ep7/vyzt3Hhb017xSxia pjB5CalXtz+HzCyZd6KTtSxl0LOIrB/RZYwXXaDBZtW4zaML17bTegEjnqh7jKakE3n2 G7uE42o76nvb2jTmUoODH+yd+gWa48TAe3CaJm/D3kQKXulqQ3KcDrGCVQMi2QbeUomp jBULU45DpnHtee+iiSAIMhIp8wkT/xYFkH+YjO0dyjBJ4elZJzIoEdWJgnCuECflAvJF YGTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oZGnTSLJ0d/OVLtQLfrMwpRtm0fCQyymSkYFwGQmu6g=; b=mjxt++ERCjJCTROm2Ov0wZSDsNBQNkfJMdAqnHpX+Rk3lZ8HN4vLgLZPcRno+zl7n2 XUoaRuYfAnLSZ1pvW/LsBtwpYhwgaZ8j+4zTx2O1f0yQkL3utHp9hZgwBE0mnPc4Eooc 0dAzNPZhrN/QzCByM/Sr8b9uepeu/c19h/BUBFKQ/LbwE7nP5EgDqnObimsmB0eKvSyu 0Fxqio0l3e2XmCUtvM89S0ZGUsiciSB52OV+9BcJ33u1sfo7WqCsg6i7gdXsH7duM9vN 8LA8mevgkESzoQI/1UZ0k7jyCChN/mNIjOkS2yD2U/WfbARghdrM54hItC8Og/IEstRj Y/zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530s82C4erjmbiKJtOhnEWifsc/AQYIWKIuT+sKVOG2O7cXUq4YO CW3MaPoGu76VQk7TJ3n/PP/C5tRwSpcTG//i8YvflFyM
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9Cmw726xQjpfH5t2bYKexBWyVLMqTqx38oh7aIyT33bxK9WmcUc2+tJv6CW3G8BVB0JZdspksXEzcYU13aco=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:c09b:: with SMTP id x27mr777275vsi.33.1615916449303; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161591246412.5771.17798271339560020312@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwbAmYbX9A3f+okpum0Gz6hKhZz-_CPxhsu-nahFvVO7Bg@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR13MB2334DCB45EB76B47C19AFDEE856B9@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR13MB2334DCB45EB76B47C19AFDEE856B9@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZAusJnQrMeKrAkkij7A2WMnDYBTZ6mKr9gadWbyA4qHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy.all@ietf.org>, "ecrit@ietf.org" <ecrit@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f290c005bdaadd51"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/CZ6T334XJkRbACT95HMuKOzewB8>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ecrit-location-profile-registry-policy-01
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:40:53 -0000

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:12 AM Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
wrote:

> Then why need this document?
>
> Isn’t it already the practice that “*The IESG will be tasked with
> appointing a designated expert (DE) to review registration requests against
> the published specification”? *
>

No, the current rules for that registry are specified by Standards Action
(Section 4.9 of RFC 8126), which requires a standards track RFC.  There's
no designated expert in that model.  The working group wants to change the
policy to the less restrictive model that allows for specifications
published outside of the IETF to qualify, subject to expert review.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email