[secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01
Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 19 June 2024 13:43 UTC
Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C494FC180B74; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHSayE7V6fiQ; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1131.google.com (mail-yw1-x1131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63F4BC16942C; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1131.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-63036fa87dbso7335017b3.1; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718804615; x=1719409415; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=D9N1AlO6Yi5xvKJdPdO6ttiYZdrqjOsPfLgQuaVGtyU=; b=Zr3q8Sp3sph/Zrh4cLnXHZPEz9K0cDl7CcNxQR54rm+nWIJtIDh6KP6uF8duXNmR4R DGjsSgHVAe2qkQ8Ene9t8yVQjFYGgt1TQ5cddxjgDxewn/vh5iXOEpDG4bE9d2MU9Jp9 XzDGBcZjPi36Gpli1V60y25T85LGShgSi7g1HrEvEb9ha2zbiPgPgTjSuLnin1lWGo/h 4TD8rn9wU5GeidzWjR6CLpedx5CHvasxGHdWbBKQu2oWCQ7Pz0YcJ6jd/kuuJPyiajYQ Ky5/TpJqnS001v9LV35t1IfzIRTXoYIXA4RdBNvRjM6Kkvw59tV54nHiKUzxkscxaDTD goSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718804615; x=1719409415; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=D9N1AlO6Yi5xvKJdPdO6ttiYZdrqjOsPfLgQuaVGtyU=; b=Y7qXSY12NQlTBUpzhvYmoXFgoqZh+7PD9G9SCQkXnNaRP9FGpbDSrzdHDMknFNxTzz qW3rnrOrwUdDUVyvaLSWUSSbGLRYFCVRJY+Xe9TyN8DlVhMGCn7lkVxe4UBQBee6S68n bf1A7tUK4IlCTQnwK7L9InCf7s+7KxBOBaQUjVuxhOqa8qdbCd8phQQM+pvmtiACZB4f yXtgoy9BoVfjliO82GbCHTmjjG6XLwmmAq2Ia9E1HR6AUwgPevuLT9zV7lW9uP2apDAO S/HqRnxh/8hY8cbj976Np08GnQ/kosqBLWzWuObZj42ppDib6rWiVzp5uy9qdQqPe1Dl Y6cg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW955vx08nLQ0FZvUsDiuXJ+NVHeQEzi4T6Z5II1sh2/aHfsHz3KVjZfw6z5hDjMvWwyoipH+CcgyB5boi7bpxMceySRta14nC4YTmuqPDKQZVFFG0Xe0u+Iz6hlrQKJHUzk3zW4kOg6rllQvibx6oH4bMhbY61Ch2yNun+u8jr
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJTNgmuYMHGxMtocOPSvfwI0GC/DO+iBWeMCqxnsKGxUJF4LxN GiQGB4oNwpWcIylnnBdGxPav5E66iBZukDAos0DM3yVbYnHHbq9m
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGlb1xEo0uCrfh4xj/dn1SzVmi2BZZCkj+LKCJzHFvZFhIM7kEi4y7oDQhl6JeZj0/ZjBgfWA==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4320:0:b0:618:90cc:bc4a with SMTP id 00721157ae682-6394ab9a704mr30792787b3.26.1718804615482; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([136.54.28.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 00721157ae682-6311a446a72sm20919447b3.76.2024.06.19.06.43.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jun 2024 06:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <171879420347.3362.7938475388839038596@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 09:43:20 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D344267-6BBD-45AB-898E-CF9B7165F23A@gmail.com>
References: <171879420347.3362.7938475388839038596@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Message-ID-Hash: 4VBH52EYZBFVVZMKZ4PCLCASLBTAVUHH
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4VBH52EYZBFVVZMKZ4PCLCASLBTAVUHH
X-MailFrom: acee.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-secdir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration.all@ietf.org, last-call <last-call@ietf.org>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/D84amszPNwRQiyTVJXx-19kipIQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:secdir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:secdir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:secdir-leave@ietf.org>
Thanks Chris! > On Jun 19, 2024, at 6:50 AM, Chris Lonvick via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > > Reviewer: Chris Lonvick > Review result: Ready > > Hello, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments > were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document > editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > The summary of the review is READY. > > As is stated in the draft, "This document changes the registration procedure > for that registry from "Standards Action" to "Expert Review"." and the Security > Considerations section states, "This document does not affect the security > issues discussed in RFC 5029." I agree with the latter and the former seems > appropriate. > > I found no nits in the document. > > Best regards, > Chris > >
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ls… Chris Lonvick via Datatracker
- [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Acee Lindem