Re: [secdir] New boilerplate for reviews

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Tue, 09 December 2014 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19311A87A4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:55:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2Rv-qiUOc5j for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D3311A87A3 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:55:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.sunet.se (smtp1.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::214]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id sB9ItTax017761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:55:30 +0100
Received: from kerio.sunet.se (kerio.sunet.se [192.36.171.210]) by smtp1.sunet.se (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sB9ItQop002270 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:55:29 +0100 (CET)
VBR-Info: md=sunet.se; mc=all; mv=swamid.se
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sunet.se; s=default; t=1418151329; bh=x4nSly+3N4GlwTQwUBnb5ktsgZHJXEIw958Jcim5ztg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=3EVMbsX0Z7TZ4ogBcCpvkvEruh/O8kCxnWHBQHNzQbXEpttOjstSV4SKk3fqdJyxW yytlIzEorCRKeYE5z3MrVnJpNEcU/UTH7ktMahxngras8BJY3+xnBz3IX2wSuZ1N/p AqgyKjJMbl3uNsHK128Ub/2YhABJKzwvCTXhmJVY=
X-Footer: c3VuZXQuc2U=
Received: from [10.0.0.116] ([62.102.145.131]) (authenticated user leifj@sunet.se) by kerio.sunet.se (Kerio Connect 8.3.4 patch 1) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for secdir@ietf.org; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 19:55:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5487459C.1060004@sunet.se>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:55:24 +0100
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@ietf.org
References: <CAHbuEH7wMVfao4CmrQHvesyF6+an5eDkucMXYWo+=v=3YSf8cA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH7wMVfao4CmrQHvesyF6+an5eDkucMXYWo+=v=3YSf8cA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.36.171.210; country=SE; latitude=62.0000; longitude=15.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=62.0000,15.0000&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sunet-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09NpuTuxD - d2d7842507e1 - 20141209
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/DQrAd2PdS6IxvFihfkNrE1u4jRs
Subject: Re: [secdir] New boilerplate for reviews
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:55:34 -0000

On 12/09/2014 07:52 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Stephen & I worked on an alternate boilerplate for reviews per request
> from several ADs as editors are a bit confused with the current text.
> They are not sure what to do with the reviews.  Ideally, we'd like
> them to address your comments during last call and then Stephen & I
> can pick up points that were not adequately addressed.
> 
> Here is a proposal for alternate text, let us know what you think:
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving
> security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts.  Comments
> not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the
> IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> Thank you.
> 

Reads a lot like the last one. Good :-)

	Cheers Leif