[secdir] SECDIR re-review of draft-secretaries-good-practices

Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653781A1B70; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:22:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLN3y9sX5hak; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x234.google.com (mail-pd0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 037E21A6EE7; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 10:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p10so1138614pdj.25 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:22:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a6WvvI1ZY035qf6aKRYIfSrxODaxRn+iMCjWvm8a950=; b=SATiBzlsMCjH1GiWAgdbGOe9ssZUzhU4/OIAVWFTRo6mZRiaWf70d91IJ2iaOwbK8k QGZRkOqWSUgt8V06rkqZ3K/MiSCKu2GdNZVqU0YzqREKEpyMrz9i41KM5sIgmlMMpIbq 1K4Psy6aqKdXUd6aha3cSKPBAqk3v52t6B4avx/R0m1yBr/fYVBdSLxhBKpAUctOIYSs jK2dT85Hnsw4UMmWPj+vZcHwVIfmVB0mUqPytVk7CzNs+0FgEd7StM9tJBdxawVf91hi Sdc3KVEvX+j5/ChFFrY+AyN1Xq6sj125W1YnHqrORVgyZg2DhXaTF78stqlJYwCH9z1I /5eg==
X-Received: by 10.70.46.201 with SMTP id x9mr30766872pdm.154.1417803720296; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.76] (172-3-137-150.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [172.3.137.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ps2sm29696386pdb.62.2014.12.05.10.21.58 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5481F7C4.3010708@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 10:21:56 -0800
From: Chris Lonvick <lonvick.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-secretaries-good-practices.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/DXu70lVgvP0-xQw8M1V7cqLx2Lg
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR re-review of draft-secretaries-good-practices
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:22:02 -0000

Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.


In my last review, the only security-related issue I raised was a nit
about the WG Chairs knowing how to revoke privileges given to a
secretary.  The security considerations section has been revised to
address this.

I scanned through the other changes that had been made to this
revision and found no other concerns.

Finally, just a note to the IESG members that this document has been
discussed on the "IETF Discuss" list over the past few weeks resulting
from the Last Call announcement.

Best regards,
Chris