[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy

"ietfdbh" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Fri, 05 July 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0FF11E80F4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 07:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.137
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cd3OHOH2UKHk for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 07:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B7E11E812B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 07:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id weVD1l0011ZXKqc58ea5Se; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:34:05 +0000
Received: from JV6RVH1 ([]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wea41l00c2yZEBF3hea4in; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:34:05 +0000
From: "ietfdbh" <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: <draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy@tools.ietf.org>, <secdir@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:33:39 -0400
Message-ID: <01c701ce798c$a4572540$ed056fc0$@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac55iDhwAJwDrFHbScmXQfLxAtCynQ==
Content-Language: en-us
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1373034845; bh=pmTmU8qf38oMQ0NaFomMhEjKPcYUgSv/fyEdLou4oJk=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=DvtOuJegHHdsVaJSKwV4WtgvyssB4gyzq6h33otHPIr70LvHDzIjQd/eP/mppNvr2 lsI3RtiNDji8UPOrhIxyYNa4JCBomgyy8a6UmWClVWo8/Qb0kvUtxqm7IgGyPWwKun d9xQ6tFIBRunuV5Q46Lx77OZxnM9DlTy72satPLw4EoJgEDZ4tMjgX+gQmZd9kFi34 EBZW5Q/gVqFA07GIB2XJOxnncinopTr/lBZJMaMBZDfDf3edSigCfeGKkb5e5mFh0f kM0zwgBMA1MI+JdvHGyHMm+KzziTti5qJdRe1juJX0/lEOHrH0dRTiNIp42XkRvO+8 Et7DqvadJel5Q==
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:34:12 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

This ID is Informational, and gathers together a list of terms and
definitions, with references, for subsequent use. There seem to be no
security implications created by creating this list. 

The security considerations section says that relevant security is
considered within the referenced documents, all but one of which is an IETF
RFC. I didn't check the 3GPP reference.

>From the security standpoint, I think this document is OK to advance. 
I don't have strong background into the referenced technologies, so cannot
tell whether the content is fine for the community.

David Harrington