Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04

[Ken Murchison <[e-mail]>]

Hi Valery,

Thank you for the review.  Per your recommendation, I have added the 
following phrase to the beginning of the Security Considerations section:

"In addition to the security properties of iCalendar (see Section of 
[RFC5545] <https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi#RFC5545>), 
..."

Is this sufficient, or do you have alternative text that you'd like to see?


On 2/10/21 7:44 AM, Valery Smyslov via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
> Review result: Ready
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
>
> The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar.
> The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations
> sections are sensible. I found the document ready.
>
> Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that
> these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].
>
>
>
-- 
Kenneth Murchison
Senior Software Developer
Fastmail US LLC