Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04.txt

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 26 November 2015 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60191B2BCF; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EfY2_MBGoVVJ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 604371B2BCE; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so29274648wme.1; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=TY2uEsV4DXYBBFSgwwMvnTytbYS+fVh+udBOOXPssWs=; b=qkAssjyoKhfSk3OAowxFLXVlKOn1rHHqRD76V1h9g03ZVZ2JmqTaBFxw29L6+zZI3l /U6/o56/HG1qBbpxE5kkRpD8a6lsITFtWuWESXyFnzsJHDe0BlAUPgpm+owa7/7za5nV Oivf7iNLLSX+fNJkGItLWHuPs71iPa9A3OCYBXGormNykCAkW8I/vHafIyRnQ4oohovk a/q+BTokjAlP+brDSPMI3EZ/75TxMjn1WeC746BN6V89Uor+5b8/YoU68EUbP9lrdwg4 vuuv14QLpRBTIWUXdI//SLFwUC59gCEyaCRhDXeYkbqt2xrArjOyRlxNmbFnsAd0Vn5A rUpg==
X-Received: by 10.28.222.138 with SMTP id v132mr5016008wmg.23.1448556349942; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.137.224] ([176.13.17.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w141sm3437420wmw.24.2015.11.26.08.45.40 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1511261043180.8897@bofh.nohats.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:45:24 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E4D82102-F1DB-450D-A2F6-6B09A75E690A@gmail.com>
References: <22102.64756.382780.262773@fireball.acr.fi> <942C4EAB-5714-4818-BD98-834AF3B4FE43@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1511261043180.8897@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Du3yG7Ebsex8LNeIAJ0rwTM5RxM>
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:45:53 -0000

> On 26 Nov 2015, at 5:43 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Yoav Nir wrote:
> 
>>> I just wonder why did the example singled out "the People's Front of
>>> Judea", and did not include "the Judean People's Front", "the Judean
>>> Popular People's Front", "the Campaign for a Free Galilee", and "the
>>> Popular Front of Judea".... :-)
>> 
>> Because the only people we hate more than the Romans, are the fucking Judean People's Front.
> 
> Please people! We are _all_ individuals!

I’m not.