IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] Review of draft-gellens-lost-validation-05

Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com> Thu, 05 March 2020 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D983A0935; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:41:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VZ5w7MddQroC; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A6A3A0934; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:41:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id g19so4833688eds.11; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:41:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PCPZeEC2rfvPSfuuILrYiOlhBm3+URtTTEeC43KBKew=; b=lK/X/qpRWIbe4Aw2Du+9T1ki3WxiAcxEu1WT4BJzxLsrHxP0s3B4eOZIbiwoxWEHVy RI+GG93YCp3x1iQputf98jAdMv95J2YEiKK+JcNThvvLMXuT/HAkJ4G6dgQf7pQjiqz6 4FWSMlNo+cowjy13qc5XNS7PRT77UQCAPnf4VsIArKJsUlxxUIKNYnISFP86EcMsPA/r 5Rbpo+W4L1lYajNSQV0FkFgPhrGwqEdeDlP7LxJiCwI22t2Y70JN32oleNvGU4YKfK/3 TocPoGWFuKatxvbiISeTiCOZPYjFSxr2M8wrWpmCWoclyQfOZINE7TjXBPBxcIuQvMFx QlGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PCPZeEC2rfvPSfuuILrYiOlhBm3+URtTTEeC43KBKew=; b=oXNqv9QSflmbmv2Xlhn54O+tQ8C4XFo/2ULvq0N6q5VJ+lwScpZzcjqmENCLT2efWZ 3ydCcNVOBQ6lhQiUSd90pp/TXb4pFVIgZbPNiaHT9yaeSAfR+/GKa/Fd02q0O5Bl4iqk RG7KGGyHgpzVBzHsT7vSzZK91TXg875r4po9JelFkh2ckSiE/asxo633h8jcj+D8f6Oc uUw77xVhc3MLk1eZU8YD/9lsvg7l0T6URXM5VVGJ5JmXY7aOwxf+AKevGMchW8ayX6Jp lZ8AcMnV3PrNk1kCdNqlzggDQ8zzT1QARakwlI9sevUEtPRefCexFvI6YzwUu5K94JPK 6llg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2Xlo1+dayPdftA1FXq2w0hofGuy4HAp61ZzUjhXsBA1YsxXcGg 85RAacoCznocSj28kL/730J9wGyP99ZmkYlaAAcWP13k9w0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsiUj22M9dp8np+MH9C8liTPaohmaMWLdg5LSo0M8UY0u/+oj9Bjy+UuE0GEQUCTpGtFcn9avedNrQVcXPZqzc=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:fc85:: with SMTP id f5mr5863338edq.294.1583376098653; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:41:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 19:41:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChzXmYFvR7qmiVrUSG1ABbGgeg+RPi9SLw=c2RnzoJvgUTHxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-gellens-lost-validation.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Shawn Emery <semery@uccs.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7fbf905a012792e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/DyfJfoS9zR-r8gczBSWlPtiJutc>
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-gellens-lost-validation-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 02:41:46 -0000

Reviewer: Shawn M. Emery
Review result: Ready

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft specifies an IANA registry for the Location-to-Service
Translation
(LoST) Protocol Validation Service Tag under U-NAPTR.

The security considerations section does exist and refers to RFC 3958 and
4848.
I agree that this change does not introduce any new security considerations.

General comments:

None.

Editorial comments:

Abbreviations should be expanded in the title of the draft and when first
used (in this case the Abstract).
s/...//

Shawn.
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email