[secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-wilde-service-link-rel-10

Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 22 March 2019 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C614130EC1; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Santesson via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-wilde-service-link-rel.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Message-ID: <155324623015.23003.17581075186850679270@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 02:17:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/EEbQhF95axz_5Pr4gArbkfLJKhU>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-wilde-service-link-rel-10
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:17:11 -0000

Reviewer: Stefan Santesson
Review result: Has Nits

This document seems to be ready and well written. The security considerations
section seems reasonable.

However, I do agree with previous review that the requirements language
boilerplate may be redundant. There are only 2 capital SHOULD requirements in
the document and they both appear in the security considerations section. None
of them are referring to things that can be tested for compliance and they
could both be downgraded to "should".