[secdir] secdir review of draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-08.txt

Carl Wallace <CWallace@cygnacom.com> Wed, 01 December 2010 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <CWallace@cygnacom.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584CF3A6C6B; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 04:34:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imgOQmb9FDLD; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 04:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sottexchE2.entrust.com (sottexche2.entrust.com [216.191.252.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DF83A69ED; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 04:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scygexch7.cygnacom.com (10.4.60.22) by sottexchE2.entrust.com (216.191.252.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:35:51 -0500
Received: from scygexch1.cygnacom.com (10.60.50.8) by scygexch7.cygnacom.com (10.4.60.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.106.1; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:36:07 -0500
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB9154.3A0D0863"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:35:24 -0500
Message-ID: <FAD1CF17F2A45B43ADE04E140BA83D48011D4B8C@scygexch1.cygnacom.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: secdir review of draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-08.txt
Thread-Index: AcuRU6b/7VIg6RDFTPSE5MacEo0z4Q==
From: Carl Wallace <CWallace@cygnacom.com>
To: <secdir@ietf.org>, <iesg@ietf.org>, <ietf@ietf.org>
Cc: s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, joestone@cisco.com
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-08.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:34:58 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

 

This is a re-review.  Following the last review, changes were made to
the security considerations section to highlight a disconnect with the
referenced security considerations in RFC 3435.  This seems sufficient
to me (though there is a typo in the new text - "securuty").