Re: [secdir] Tuesday lunch in Toronto conflict
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 24 June 2014 10:20 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC04D1B29CC for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWJ8HJUrtgri for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8E81B29E2 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0BDBE4D for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:20:16 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XZp3NLnSL9Bl for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:20:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.196.201.139] (179-193.icannmeeting.org [199.91.193.179]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D651ABE8B for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:20:12 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <53A950DC.2090604@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:20:12 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <53A2D94B.6080503@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <53A2D94B.6080503@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/FYwRe53rq1EYdx5NspngRgSo3bY
Subject: Re: [secdir] Tuesday lunch in Toronto conflict
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:20:21 -0000
Result: 11 participants, 8 said don't move, 3 said they'll go to the ISOC gig, so we'll stick with the usual secdir Tuesday lunch slot. Thanks, S. On 19/06/14 13:36, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > ISOC are organising one of their lunch time sessions in Toronto > on the topic of "Internet Security and Privacy: Ten years later" > > That conflicts with out usual get together which is a pity. > We could try find another slot or just live with the conflict. > (These ISOC things tend to be fairly high level informational > panels rather than nitty-gritty lets-do-stuff meetings so I'm > told.) > > Kathleen and I would like to see what folks prefer. If enough > of us want to move we'll try (and possibly fail) to find > another slot. > > I've created a doodle poll. > > Please answer: > > yes - if want to attend both and we should try move > the secdir lunch > > if-need-be - if you're going to attend the ISOC thing > and not secdir if there is a conflict > > no - if you think we should live with the conflict and > you will attend secdir regardless > > The poll is at [1]. Please fill it in before the end > of next Monday. If you've comments on the poll, enter > them there please - if we need more mail on this we > can do that next week. > > If you're doing something else during that slot, then > why did you read this far? :-) > > Thanks, > S. > > [1] http://doodle.com/ktv2q3yr6s4e2am5 > > _______________________________________________ > secdir mailing list > secdir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview > >
- [secdir] Tuesday lunch in Toronto conflict Stephen Farrell
- Re: [secdir] Tuesday lunch in Toronto conflict Stephen Farrell