[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni-02

Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com> Mon, 27 December 2010 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309C93A683E for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:02:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZOs+imfZK5l for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9E43A6832 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwn40 with SMTP id 40so8895932iwn.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mS4tQm1TJHx6hvg3c+nsk5HviBNV0XI9rf8EmtHKCSQ=; b=eZNw/xDKOVOH4qZH6sLM+2s1UD7Mf+ApqpVSYZXhEhr1F6O50PX3aTuZFed83FPAHV VMP/ox0iYMmldbiRlSGqWWgAcg13VAIq2GG31b0jqg+UWbGffkOJrb3NatGB9kY2go2X 5s1IpYNgSFsmTRn9U+aX4n6zW791vzQu/F2IE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uhtK1bY4FeKAFEZ1WYBOuY7E9LFpOwbLeHuha5gzLthKnXCEIlWFhfCD4u4S359GJl TR7KPBkdCA50aASyZKLqe7jJpEYzjHViQxYfhg4KDmd9NsXrYfLm0KWDDmNgU85Mewpm uDdGhdGH9TM1572KhjjUf/obRrc0EnatBK4so=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.170.1 with SMTP id d1mr12033846icz.227.1293422671867; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.220.199 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:31 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikQMzj62As0ZXLtKzZReAyctmJOwUWz-eWo6-cM@mail.gmail.com>
From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni.all@ietf.all, secdir@ietf.org, iest@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni-02
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 04:02:28 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This very short document slightly updates the definitions of the
Transport service interfaces from "span" to "reference point",
updating RFC 5921.  As the authors accurately say in the security
considerations section, "the security considerations of [RFC5921]
apply.  The updated reference models provided by this document
introduce no new security considerations."

Radia