[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni-02

Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com> Mon, 27 December 2010 04:02 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=uhtK1bY4FeKAFEZ1WYBOuY7E9LFpOwbLeHuha5gzLthKnXCEIlWFhfCD4u4S359GJl TR7KPBkdCA50aASyZKLqe7jJpEYzjHViQxYfhg4KDmd9NsXrYfLm0KWDDmNgU85Mewpm uDdGhdGH9TM1572KhjjUf/obRrc0EnatBK4so=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:04:31 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikQMzj62As0ZXLtKzZReAyctmJOwUWz-eWo6-cM@mail.gmail.com>
From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni.all@ietf.all, secdir@ietf.org, iest@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni-02
Precedence: list

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This very short document slightly updates the definitions of the
Transport service interfaces from "span" to "reference point",
updating RFC 5921.  As the authors accurately say in the security
considerations section, "the security considerations of [RFC5921]
apply.  The updated reference models provided by this document
introduce no new security considerations."

Radia

[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-… Radia Perlman