Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Mon, 19 December 2016 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AB81295AA; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:43:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnAGcQUfRkFy; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:43:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51354129418; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:43:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1634; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482173016; x=1483382616; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=cQYlvQAVofY4EmdjdQq2xQ0Mik7tjIvOF30GZRure40=; b=Mu5Jf2zllpeYUBWSxLScI2Qls75vIWxTFzi9GeOr8rld4J2KbthHZexe hQj4Vo8ujXPgRW7dMIA2Bs2C27Xmhf29C/mwYwgyWwGWE1BP+XXqgeE6S uQQ7isbp8iRRKEmRtGiWsIeDqHE2wHiTs1WO38jNr2MoNviv6pU2Ou7DA U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CIAQCUKVhY/40NJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR+BYAcBjUeWWZUOggqGIgIagWg/FAECAQEBAQEBAWI?= =?us-ascii?q?ohGgBAQEEEhERUQQCAQgRBAEBAwIjAwICAjAUAQgIAgQBEggMDohJmloBjXaCK?= =?us-ascii?q?IsMAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYELhSuEWYRXgm2CXQWVA4VtAYkfiAu?= =?us-ascii?q?QVo4ZhA4BHzeBJYYBcod9AYEMAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,374,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="183038269"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Dec 2016 18:43:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBJIhZq5013774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:43:35 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:43:34 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:43:34 -0600
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
Thread-Index: AQHSWiPFZXbyJGrfFk2KWO4vdz9ZZKEPmy1Q
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:43:34 +0000
Message-ID: <b0142c384fbe4cda97868b84a867b73f@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
References: <27F009E7-E8C2-4235-8288-DC8637FCF370@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <27F009E7-E8C2-4235-8288-DC8637FCF370@inria.fr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [128.107.147.22]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Gb1eCCPQoepSz9yODmZZzsBM_Yk>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:43:38 -0000

Thanks Vincent,

Jakob.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Roca [mailto:vincent.roca@inria.fr]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 10:14 AM
> To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;; secdir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org
> Cc: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>;
> Subject: Secdir review of draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> IMHO, the document is Ready.
> 
> This document specifies an extension to BGP Communities.
> The initial RFC1997 being a bit old, it does not include any security discussion section.
> Therefore it is important that the present document has a detailed discussion on the
> topic, which is actually the case. The level of details seems appropriate.
> Furthermore there is a dedicated "Error handling" section which is also fine.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>    Vincent