Re: [secdir] secdir lunch question

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 26 March 2012 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE2D21F855F for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7j5Aton8+dp for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scss.tcd.ie (hermes.scss.tcd.ie [IPv6:2001:770:10:200:889f:cdff:fe8d:ccd2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901AC21F8517 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B75171C08 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:42:22 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1332747742; bh=ja5vlvNQRlEC8y ynt8vmGHE+tCmxo0hq4C2GzWnTfho=; b=3I84D0bBLx+8YnUXKEWNHJdYg7pzQs 8/h9fEtP9m4tic5kLeAbTelTTBXAqn1nuoItwD52rr36/g2uI8V8v1Nc1EUMdHxn 2TGY3pMdNSXr+k1D+VUd7PljPBFvMuwdmVVGn4+Onw+r4PTCJfo0Y4tOn5KFY3IJ k7lq6U/sIXhUhG4XWGXYGjznYRWY066AZUI94ZqhFnJX3XR2+S33bzqKGqG5iz+i x5FjoWof+AqmnsznGNWjw4ESQYitYHZsIX2Q81G6WLoCvvlsN2dPHKl4NpMq1r7C x+X+vzu0PnpX8qyfLreJc1jBHgup0kQWvp/EphoH7alZ2AQW2kgx0WxQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id ZrOC6PG3AOCu for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:42:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [130.129.37.121] (dhcp-2579.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.37.121]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 527A4171C02 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:42:22 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4F701DDD.6060405@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:42:21 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
References: <4F5FC1B1.2090806@cs.tcd.ie> <4F6B3E81.7070303@cs.tcd.ie> <4F6C6CB3.4030203@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F6C6CB3.4030203@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir lunch question
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:42:30 -0000

And for those of you who prefer the ISOC gig this time:

"We will set aside 10 places for secdir folks.  Please tell them to
identify themselves as "secdir" participants at the door.

The briefing panel will be held in Room 242AB at La Palais tomorrow at
11:45."

Cheers,
S.

On 03/23/2012 12:29 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Room 251 for the secdir lunch.
>
> spt
>
> On 3/22/12 4:00 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> Sorry for being slow getting back to this, it got lost (in
>> my head) when travelling last week.
>>
>> Summary of the responses I've seen on and off list included
>> is:
>>
>> - find another time please (1)
>> - (a) secdir lunch anyway (4)
>> - (b) skip secdir this time, go to ISOC gig (4.5)
>> - have both (0.5)
>> - no opinion (dunno why we got a mail then;-) (1)
>> - will go to secdir if on, otherwise ISOC (2)
>> - whichever has beer (1, no it wasn't me:-)
>>
>> Having seen that, Sean wisely suggested we go for
>> a possibly smaller secdir lunch crowd this time and
>> I'll ask for 10 seats to be reserved for secdir folks
>> at the ISOC gig. Please let me know if you need one.
>>
>> So, secdir lunch will be on (room tbd) and some of
>> us will skip that to check out the ISOC thingy this
>> time.
>>
>> S.
>>
>>
>> On 03/13/2012 09:52 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> ISOC are organising an openid and oauth briefing session
>>> in Paris that clashes with our usual secdir lunch session.
>>> The clash is unfortunate but there's nothing to be done
>>> about it now, since slots are so scarce.
>>>
>>> So Sean and I wanted to check with you if you'd rather:
>>>
>>> a) go ahead with the secdir lunch as usual
>>> or
>>> b) skip the secdir lunch this time to allow interested
>>> folks to go to the ISOC gig.
>>>
>>> Can you let Sean and I know which you prefer say by
>>> Monday? (Off list is fine and I'll summarise or use the
>>> list if you prefer.)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> S.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> secdir mailing list
>>> secdir@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>>> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> secdir mailing list
>> secdir@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
>> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>