Re: [secdir] [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 03 October 2018 00:53 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1107313116D; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bcGdxg4LoDpH; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A25D131161; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 17:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1g7VPL-0002tW-Cr; Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:52:56 +0000
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 17:52:54 -0700
Message-ID: <m21s97g8bd.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, anima@ietf.org, Security Directorate <secdir@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <ae654d8c-eb5e-95d5-f3ce-a24d6d8a71f4@gmail.com>
References: <153826253306.18743.9250084704876465818@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2sh1qkebi.wl-randy@psg.com> <057bd957-06b4-824e-a7c8-214383819621@huitema.net> <m2murxi8ws.wl-randy@psg.com> <b4a32733-c2df-6bea-17d2-4d45ee4d5136@cisco.com> <m2wor0h9vu.wl-randy@psg.com> <1fd9c9d5-508f-901e-818c-3cc87725c331@cisco.com> <m2d0ssh661.wl-randy@psg.com> <2555.1538506845@localhost> <6b2f2b80-5e9e-101f-4aac-f182f638f8b1@gmail.com> <e23fefe6-fcad-6c5c-fbef-9dac9270b42c@joelhalpern.com> <ae654d8c-eb5e-95d5-f3ce-a24d6d8a71f4@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GefUN_DVMEE4udv7INRLd9hvACE>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Anima] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-16
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:53:05 -0000

> I think it's been thought through but badly articulated. In that sense,
> the Last Call is doing its job.

does that mean that i can stop trying for a narten medal, go back to
work, and christian will wake me up again when my two scenarios have
clear answers; one hopes ones with which i can live?

also, please tell me that i do not need to stick my nose into the rest
of anima in order to let the user unequivocally own what they buy.  i
have my own rabbit holes to pursue in the ietf.

randy